To Darwin’s Surprise and Delight

This article on how viruses have affected evolution was a fascinating read. I think that this article is titled “Darwin’s Surprise” because Darwin would never have expected to find that after he collected such extensive evidence to support his theory of natural selection in fact,  “nothing provides more convincing evidence for the ‘theory’ of evolution than the viruses contained within our DNA”. I think he would have found it the most surprising that many of the commonalities between the DNA of apes and humans are retroviral DNA, which would have to have been inherited from a common ancestor. If anything, I think he would have been, as the article suggests, excited and intrigued by these discoveries, at least after he got over his initial surprise. What I found most surprising about this article is that more of our DNA is made up of old retroviruses than is made up of DNA that codes for proteins, about ten percent versus less than two percent respectively. I guess it’s hard for me to imagine the length of a DNA strand in order to make sense of the idea that only two percent of our DNA codes for the millions of different functions that are carried out in the human body. It’s also a bit frightening to think that so much of my DNA is composed of viruses, which I usually associate with the negative experience of being sick. After reading this article, however, I definitely have a new understanding of how viruses can affect the human race.

The article suggests that viruses played a major role in evolution. Viruses might be the reason that mammals developed the placenta, which has definitely been a benefit to mammals. Scientists found that a protein that causes placental cells to fuse together uses the same mechanism that retroviruses use to attach to cells that they infect. The evolution of the placenta led to live birth, which the article explains is “one of the hallmarks of our evolutionary success over birds, reptiles, and fish.” The placenta also allows the fetus to eliminate waste and draw the maternal nutrients that allow mammals to develop the large brains that have made us so resourceful. Without viruses, this might never have been possible. Viruses might also be the reason that we split off from chimps five million years ago, since humans developed an effective defense against Pan troglodytes, a retrovirus that affected chimps. At the same time, this defense may have left humans vulnerable to HIV, which chimps can contract without being affected by it. It turns out that one protein either blocks Pan troglodytes or HIV, but never both. If scientists could develop a drug that works the way the protein works in chimps, so as to recognize and neutralize HIV, humans might be able to effectively defend against the virus. Based on this article, I definitely agree that viruses are a driving force in evolution, and after reading it, my entire perception of viruses as changed. Now, instead of thinking of them as a wholly negative force, I can see what a positive effect viruses have the potential to make on our development as a species.

I do think science should “revive” dead viruses because it is clear from this article that there are some significant benefits from doing so. Not only could the revival of dead viruses lead to a cure for retroviruses like HIV, there’s an added benefit of learning more about humans as a species through studying viruses. I do think it is important, however, that scientists exercise caution. Although the article mentions several times that scientists reconstruct viruses so that they can only reproduce once, if something were to go wrong and the virus was released, it could very quickly lead to a pandemic. I would also be wary of so specifically describing how it is that they reassemble these viruses, because the viruses could very easily be used for biological warfare if the means fell into the wrong hands. At this current time, I think the benefits of reviving dead viruses outweigh the risks, but I think scientists definitely have to be careful because if hostile groups were to use previously extinct viruses in war, entire populations could be decimated.

This entry was posted in Evolution, Viruses. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to To Darwin’s Surprise and Delight

  1. ZeenaF says:

    Wow, I didn’t really put much thought into the possibility of reconstructed viruses being used as biological warfare. Though I’m sure thought would occur to someone who really wanted a means of biological warfare and had the knowledge to reconstruct a virus, I am almost wary of talking about it on this blog so as not to spread the idea! It’s really shocking to think about that. Viruses have tortured (and also helped) all organisms for so long, and currently the HIV virus is causing so much havoc, that it’s really hard to imagine someone wishing to spread a similarly devastating virus as warfare. However, on second thought, I don’t think that using viruses as biological warfare would even be plausible, as it would be nearly impossible to ensure that the virus isn’t spread to the perpetrator and its allies. To be honest, though, if we have figured out a way to revive dead viruses in a way that they only reproduce once, I’d be willing to be that someone could find a way to revive a dead virus so that it only targets cells in the presence of certain environmental stimuli that are unique to the location of people they are at war against (uh oh, I think I just figured something out…). This is really scary!

  2. jdoomingo says:

    I don’t think I completely agree with the idea of jumping into the revival of viruses. I do find it interesting that retroviruses not only play a huge role in our evolution with organs such as the placenta but our similarities with primates ( which also is further evidence towards the common ancestor). To even fathom the possibility of a cure to HIV with the research of retrovirus seems too good to be true. Ideally, we would have to look into the protein in apes and realize how that creates an immunity to HIV. With that in mind, ‘resurrecting’ viruses or just this new hype of controlling them could give us blueprints for a new line of defense. I must sound cruel not fully accepting this movement but I do agree with Maxine that there are risks of biological warfare. Though the benefits are great, especially with so many people plagued with such a disease, I also think about the rate of viral evolution. I could be interpreting this wrong, but it makes me think that we could be speeding up this process.

  3. kkyou says:

    It’s interesting to think about what Darwin would have thought about viruses and their implication in evolutionary processes. How these non-living parasites could become so integrated into our genomic sequence is amazing. It also demonstrates how wonderfully complicated an organism is and how powerful the evolutionary process is. At first approach, it does seem like that having such a large percent of our DNA be ancient virus fragments seems counter-intuitive and intimidating but I also think that it makes a lot of sense as even evidence of plagues can be seen in our genetic code.
    To think about viruses as living or dead is somewhat humorous as they are not living entities in the first place. Nevertheless, I do believe that there should be a continuation of research in this field of virology. There is a huge potential in this field and its implications in the use of medicine can radically change how evolution will progress in the human species. I do not think that biological warfare is a very likely scenario with the use of paleovirological techniques simply because it would be difficult to control the virus once released. This part of the article reminds me of a Stanford article that talked about the search for a universal flu vaccine by targeting the protein stem that are common in most viruses. Perhaps one day an ancient viral code in our genes could be the source of a vaccine that prevents future infections.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s